کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1185117 1492080 2016 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Selection of grapevine leaf varieties for culinary process based on phytochemical composition and antioxidant properties
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
انتخاب ارقام برگ انگور برای فرآیند آشپزی بر اساس ترکیب فیتوشیمیایی و خواص آنتی اکسیدانی
کلمات کلیدی
Vitis vinifera L .؛ برگ انگور؛ تنوع؛ آنتی اکسیدان؛ Phytochemicals
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه شیمی شیمی آنالیزی یا شیمی تجزیه
چکیده انگلیسی


• Ten Portuguese grapevine leaf varieties were studied for inclusion in human diet.
• Antioxidant properties and phytochemicals content were assessed.
• White varieties have higher antioxidant activity and content in phenolic compounds.
• Malvasia Fina stood out as the most suitable variety for inclusion in human diet.
• Touriga Franca revealed lower antioxidant activity and phytochemicals content.

Grapevine leaves are an abundant sub-product of vineyards which is devalued in many regions. The objective of this work is to study the antioxidant activity and phytochemical composition of ten grapevine leaf varieties (four red varieties: Tinta Amarela, Tinta Roriz, Touriga Franca, and Touriga Nacional; and six white varieties: Côdega do Larinho, Fernão Pires, Gouveio, Malvasia Fina, Rabigato, and Viosinho) to select varieties to be used as food ingredients.White grapevine leaves revealed higher antioxidant potential. Malvasia Fina reported better antioxidant properties contrasting with Touriga Franca. Phenolic content varied between 112 and 150 mg GAE g−1 of extract (gallic acid equivalents), hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives and flavonols varied between 76 and 108 mg CAE g−1 of extract (caffeic acid equivalents) and 39 and 54 mg QE g−1 of extract (quercetin equivalents).Malvasia Fina is a good candidate for culinary treatment due to its antioxidant properties and composition in bioactive compounds.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Food Chemistry - Volume 212, 1 December 2016, Pages 291–295
نویسندگان
, , , ,