کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1269028 | 1497425 | 2015 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• A low cost membrane (LCM) was developed and tested in an air-cathode MFC, LCM–MFC.
• The performance of an LCM–MFC was compared to one equipped with NF(NF–MFC).
• Rint was similar and low (ca. 100 Ω) for both LCM– and NF–MFC.
• PV,max were 2146 and 14,246 mW/m3 for LCM– and NF–MFC, respectively.
• There is a trade-off between lower power but achieving 99.2% savings in PEM costs.
The aims of this research were: (i) to develop and test a new, low cost, organic membrane (LCM) in an air-cathode, single chamber microbial fuel cell (MFC), and (ii) to compare its characteristics with those of an MFC equipped with a Nafion® 117 membrane (NF). The internal resistances (Rint) were 112 and 110 Ω using LCM and NF, respectively, whereas the maximum volumetric powers (PV,max) were 2146 and 14,246 mW/m3 for LCM and NF, respectively. The relatively low value of Rint of the MFC equipped with LCM was encouraging. Furthermore, the Rint of the NF-equipped MFC was of the same order.PV,max delivered with LCM was 15% of that with NF. However, the cost ratio LCM/NF was very low, ($14/m2)/($1733/m2) ∼ 0.8%. These results point out to a trade-off between sacrificing some power output of the cell (85%) but achieving outstanding savings on membrane costs (99.2%).
Journal: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy - Volume 40, Issue 48, 28 December 2015, Pages 17380–17387