کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1290267 973322 2008 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Optimization of the performance of polymer electrolyte fuel cell membrane-electrode assemblies: Roles of curing parameters on the catalyst and ionomer structures and morphology
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه شیمی الکتروشیمی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Optimization of the performance of polymer electrolyte fuel cell membrane-electrode assemblies: Roles of curing parameters on the catalyst and ionomer structures and morphology
چکیده انگلیسی

In order to understand the origin of performance variations in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), a series of membrane-electrode assemblies (MEAs) with identical electrode layer compositions were prepared using different electrode curing conditions, their performances were evaluated, and their morphologies determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The polarization curves varied markedly primarily due to differences in morphologies of electrodes, which were dictated by the curing processes. The highest performing MEAs (1.46 W cm−2 peak power density at 3.2 A cm−2 and 80 °C) were prepared using a slow curing process at a lower temperature, whereas those MEAs prepared using a faster curing process performed poorly (0.1948 W cm−2 peak power density at 440 mA cm−2 and 80 °C). The slowly cured MEAs showed uniform electrode catalyst and ionomer distributions, as revealed in SEM images and elemental maps. The relatively faster cured materials exhibited uneven distribution of ionomer with significant catalyst clustering. Collectively, these results indicate that to achieve optimal performance, factors that affect the dynamics of the curing process, such as rate of solvent evaporation, must be carefully controlled to avoid solvent trapping, minimize catalyst coagulation, and promote even distribution of ionomer.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Power Sources - Volume 182, Issue 1, 15 July 2008, Pages 61–65
نویسندگان
, , ,