کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1321529 | 1499894 | 2013 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

• This work explained why hydrocarboxylation instead of hydrosilylation is preferred.
• CO2 insertion process is more favorable kinetically than hydrosilylation process.
• Provide helpful information in designing new related reactions.
The hydrocarboxylation and hydrosilylation processes proposed in the copper-catalyzed reaction among carbon dioxide, diphenylacetylene and HSi(OEt)3 were comparatively studied with the aid of density functional theory calculations. Our study is to explore why the reaction preferred a hydrocarboxylation rather than a hydrosilylation process. It was found that the σ bond metathesis between Cu–C and H–Si involved in the hydrosilylation process had a significantly high reaction barrier in the presence of CO2 (47.4 kcal/mol). Instead, CO2 insertion and the subsequent σ bond metathesis between Cu–O and H–Si involved in the hydrocarboxylation process were confirmed kinetically feasible, consistent with the experimental facts.
The hydrocarboxylation and hydrosilylation processes proposed in the copper-catalyzed reaction among hydrosilane, alkyne and carbon dioxide were comparatively studied using density functional theory calculations.Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide
Journal: Journal of Organometallic Chemistry - Volumes 745–746, 15 November 2013, Pages 166–172