Design, modification and 3D QSAR studies of novel 2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-containing 4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole derivatives as inhibitors of B-Raf kinase

Two series of novel 2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-containing 4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole derivatives C1–C15 and D1–D15 have been synthesized and evaluated for their B-Raf inhibitory and anti-proliferation activities. Compound C14 ((3-(4-bromophenyl)-5-(2-fluorophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)(2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-6-yl)methanone) showed the most potent biological activity against B-RafV600E (IC50 = 0.11 μM) and WM266.4 human melanoma cell line (GI50 = 0.58 μM), being comparable with the positive control Erlotinib and more potent than our previous best compound, while D10 ((2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-2-yl)(5-(3-fluorophenyl)-3-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)methanone) performed the best in the D series (IC50 = 1.70 μM; GI50 = 1.45 μM). The docking simulation was performed to analyze the probable binding models and poses and the QSAR model was built for reasonable design of B-Raf inhibitors in future. The introduction of 2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin structure reinforced the combination of our compounds and the receptor, resulting in progress of bioactivity.

Two series of novel 2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-containing 4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole derivatives C1–C15 and D1–D15 have been synthesized and evaluated for their B-Raf inhibitory and anti-proliferation activities. Compound C14 ((3-(4-bromophenyl)-5-(2-fluorophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)(2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-6-yl)methanone) showed the most potent biological activity against B-RafV600E (IC50 = 0.11 μM) and WM266.4 human melanoma cell line (GI50 = 0.58 μM), being comparable with the positive control Erlotinib and more potent than our previous best compound, while D10 ((2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-2-yl)(5-(3-fluorophenyl)-3-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)methanone) performed the best in the D series (IC50 = 1.70 μM; GI50 = 1.45 μM). The docking simulation was performed to analyze the probable binding models and poses and the QSAR model was built for reasonable design of B-Raf inhibitors in future. The introduction of 2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin structure reinforced the combination of our compounds and the receptor, resulting in progress of bioactivity.Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide