|کد مقاله||کد نشریه||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||نسخه تمام متن|
|138798||162473||2015||11 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||دانلود رایگان|
• Early PR histories misrepresent the meaning and usage of propaganda.
• Propaganda was frequently associated with subversive groups.
• Propaganda was not a neutral term for publicity or public relations practice.
• Bernays’s writings present an inaccurate history of early public relations.
Analysis of U.S. press coverage of propaganda indicates that the term propaganda had a largely negative connotation in the nineteenth and early twentieth century. Propaganda’s association with religious, political, and grassroots organizations is identified and discussed. This analysis concludes that Edward Bernays’s assertion that propaganda was a neutral term for PR practice prior to 1918 is inaccurate. Implications for PR historiography are discussed.
Journal: Public Relations Review - Volume 41, Issue 4, November 2015, Pages 551–561