کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
139197 162486 2011 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Differences between the public and private communication of rumors. A pilot survey in Belgium
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی مدیریت، کسب و کار و حسابداری بازاریابی و مدیریت بازار
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Differences between the public and private communication of rumors. A pilot survey in Belgium
چکیده انگلیسی

Liu et al. (2010) and Gelders et al. (2007) called for evidence-based research on differences between public and private sector communication. This article offers such data by focusing on an increasingly important domain of public relations (i.e., corporate communication about rumors vis-à-vis internal and external stakeholders).Our results show government communicators are more frequently confronted with harmful rumors than business communicators but a similar number of respondents from each group have experienced the listed effects and these respondents rate the effects as equally severe. However, fewer public sector communicators have applied most of the proposed strategies, and those who did found them to be in most cases less effective than private sector respondents. In other words, government communicators hear more rumors, experience equally often the negative effects and find them equally severe as business communicators, but they often do not react to them and if they do, they do not find the strategies to be very effective.This study suggests that typical features of public sector organizations, such as the capricious political climate and the influence of party politics, might offer an explanation for these findings.


► Government communicators confronted more frequently with harmful rumors.
► Effects experienced equally often and rated equally severe by business and government communicators.
► Strategies used less and rated less effective by government communicators.
► Differences explained by typical features of public sector organizations.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Public Relations Review - Volume 37, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages 281–291
نویسندگان
, ,