Osteoblast cell behavior on the new beta-type Ti–25Ta–25Nb alloy

Among metallic materials used as bone substitutes, β titanium alloys gain an increasing importance because of their low modulus, high corrosion resistance and good biocompatibility. In this work, an investigation of the in vitro cytocompatibility of a recently new developed β-type Ti–25Ta–25Nb alloy was carried out by evaluating the behavior of human osteoblasts. The metallic Ti–6Al–4V biomaterial, which is one of representative α + β type titanium alloys for biomedical applications, and Tissue Culture Polystyrene (TCPS), were also investigated as reference Ti-based material and control substrate, respectively. Both metallic surfaces were analyzed by X-ray diffraction, atomic force microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The cellular response was quantified by assessments of viability, cell attachment and spreading, cell morphology, production and extracellular organization of fibronectin and cell proliferation. Polished surfaces from both materials having an equiaxed grain microstructure and nanometre scale surface roughness elicited an essentially identical osteoblast response in terms of all analyzed cellular parameters. Thus, on both surfaces the cells displayed high survival rates, good cell adhesion and spreading, a dense and randomly dispersed fibronectin matrix and increasing cell proliferation rates over the incubation time. Furhermore, the enhanced biological performance of Ti–25Ta–25Nb was highly supported by the results obtained in comparison with TCPS. These findings, together with previously shown superelastic behavior, low Young's modulus and high corrosion resistance, recommend Ti–25Ta–25Nb as good candidate for applications in bone implantology.

New beta-type Ti–25Ta–25Nb alloy (A) promotes osteoblast attachment, spreading (1) and proliferation (2) to an approximately equal extent with commonly used biomedical Ti–6Al–4V alloy (B).Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► New superelastic Ti–25Ta–25Nb alloy synthesized by cold crucible levitation melting.
► We compare osteoblast response to Ti–25Ta–25Nb, Ti–6Al–4V and TCPS (control).
► Ti–25Ta–25Nb and Ti–6Al–4V exhibit approximately similar biological performance.
► We conclude that Ti–25Ta–25Nb is a promising biomaterial for bone implantation.