کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1608583 1516245 2015 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Evaluation of hydrogen trapping mechanisms during performance of different hydrogen fugacity in a lean duplex stainless steel
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ارزیابی مکانیزم های تله هیدروژن در حین انجام فرایند هیدروژن متفاوت در یک فولاد ضد زنگ دوبلکس لاغر
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی مواد فلزات و آلیاژها
چکیده انگلیسی


• The relation between hydrogen distribution and trapping in LDS is discussed.
• Hydrogen's initial state in LDS causes different microstructural changes.
• Gaseous charged LDS creates higher trapping energy compared to cathodic charged LDS.
• The dominant phase transformation in cathodic charged LDS is γ → γ∗.
• The dominant phase transformation in gaseous charged LDS is sigma (σ).

Hydrogen trapping behavior in a lean duplex stainless steel (LDS) is studied by means of thermal desorption spectrometry (TDS). The susceptibility of a metal to hydrogen embrittlement is directly related to the trap characteristics: source or sink (reversible or irreversible, respectively). Since trapping affects the metal's diffusivity, it has a major influence on the hydrogen assisted cracking (HAC) phenomenon. It is known from previously published works that the susceptibility will depend on the competition between reversible and irreversible traps; meaning a direct relation to the hydrogen's initial state in the steel. In this research the trapping mechanism of LDS, exposed to different hydrogen charging environments, is analyzed by means of TDS. The TDS analysis was supported and confirmed by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD), hydrogen quantitative measurements and microstructural observations. It was found that gaseous charging (which produces lower hydrogen fugacity) creates ∼22% higher activation energy for hydrogen trapping compared with cathodic charging (which produces higher hydrogen fugacity). These results are due to the different effects on the hydrogen behavior in LDS which causes a major difference in the hydrogen contents and different hydrogen assisted phase transitions. The highest activation energy value in the cathodic charged sample was ascribed to the dominant phase transformation of γ → γ∗, whereas in the gaseous charged sample it was ascribed to the dominant formation of intermetallic compound, sigma (σ). The relation between hydrogen distribution in LDS and hydrogen trapping mechanism is discussed in details.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Alloys and Compounds - Volume 648, 5 November 2015, Pages 601–608
نویسندگان
, , , , ,