Capabilities and limitations of multi-regime flamelet combustion models

Flamelet combustion models typically assume that burning occurs in either a fully premixed or a fully non-premixed mode. These assumptions tend to limit the applicability of the models to single-regime combustors. Efforts aimed at reducing this limitation have introduced multi-regime approaches that account for different types of mixing and chemistry interactions. In this study a multi-regime model is applied to two laminar n-heptane flames in an effort to characterize the capabilities and limitations of the approach. Both a 2-D laminar triple flame and a 2-D laminar counter-flow diffusion flame are numerically simulated using the multi-regime model. Data for comparison is generated by additionally simulating the flames using finite rate chemistry, a purely premixed flamelet model, and a purely non-premixed flamelet model. Simulations demonstrate that the multi-regime approach functions as desired, and tends to access flamelets from the appropriate regime under both non-premixed and premixed conditions. Some important differences between the flamelet solutions and finite rate solution are observed, however. These differences are caused by the finite rate solution deviating away from the assumed flamelet manifolds, rather than by inadequate regime predictions. In the analyses of these simulations, an emphasis is placed on understanding the formation of the pollutant species NO. It is shown that even when the local combustion regime is correctly predicted, small deviations from an assumed flamelet manifold can lead to changes in the NO production rate. The simulation results confirm that multi-regime flamelet models are applicable to a wide variety of reacting flows, but the results also help to characterize the limitations of these models.