کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1710854 1519517 2016 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Digital image analyses as an alternative tool for chicken quality assessment
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تجزیه و تحلیل دیجیتال به عنوان یک ابزار جایگزین برای ارزیابی کیفیت مرغ
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه سایر رشته های مهندسی کنترل و سیستم های مهندسی
چکیده انگلیسی


• Image analyses were used for fast assessment of chicken samples.
• Chicken colour was measured by computer vision technique.
• Chicken samples were classified according to quality features.
• RGB by computer vision obtained similar results (L* with R2 = 0.99) to colorimeter.

Poultry meat colour is an important quality attribute for the rapid detection of “pale poultry syndrome”, as it is affected by conditions of animal welfare during pre-mortem period. The meat processing industry demands a fast and non-contact method for accurate meat colour assessment. In the present study, computer vision was tested as a potential tool to predict colour measurements compared to CIELab attributes of chicken breast (pectoralis major) obtained by analytical reference measurements. The proposed approach using computer vision was successful in avoiding pixels with little information (specular reflection) and based on an illumination normalisation step it was obtained an acceptable correlation between colorimeter measurements and the proposed framework (Delta E = 5.2). High correlation coefficients obtained between computer vision and colorimeter validate the approach for measuring L* colour component. Results for determination coefficient was R2 = 0.99 for L*. In addition, our framework reach R2 = 0.74 for a*, and R2 = 0.88 for b* component. Results suggest that computer vision methods base on an RGB device can become useful tool for fast quality assessment of chicken meat in large-scale processing plants.

Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Biosystems Engineering - Volume 144, April 2016, Pages 85–93
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,