کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1732687 1521481 2014 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Energy performance of different photovoltaic module technologies under outdoor conditions
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
عملکرد انرژی فن آوری های مختلف فتوولتائیک تحت شرایط محیطی
کلمات کلیدی
عملکرد روزانه، نسبت عملکرد روزانه، رتبه انرژی فتوولتائیک، فیلم نازک
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی انرژی انرژی (عمومی)
چکیده انگلیسی


• Study of the energy produced by photovoltaic modules of different technologies.
• The thin film modules have very good performance in high irradiation conditions.
• Empirical model for calculating the daily energy produced with a RME less than 5%.
• The model uses the daily irradiation and the daily average module temperature.

A comparative study is performed to obtain the energy performance of four different photovoltaic module technologies, when they are exposed to the same real sun conditions over a one-year period under the meteorological conditions of Southern Spain. Modules of thin film technologies were analysed: amorphous silicon (a-Si), tandem structure of amorphous silicon and microcrystalline silicon (a-Si/μc-Si) and cadmium telluride (CdTe). In addition, a polycrystalline silicon module (pc-Si) was studied. The modules were characterised by measuring their I–V curve. Thin film modules show changes of the peak power at STC (Standard Test Conditions) throughout the year. This variation is more remarkable in a-Si modules. The performance comparison shows that the perfomance of thin film modules is better than that of pc-Si modules for this location. However, CdTe and pc-Si modules present better performances during the winter months with higher daily yield values and lower total losses, while a-Si and a-Si/μc-Si modules perform better in summer. This paper also presents an empirical model that allows the daily energy performance of different module technologies to be calculated according to the daily irradiation and to the daily average temperature of the module. The proposed empirical model has an average relative error under 5% for all analysed modules.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Energy - Volume 65, 1 February 2014, Pages 295–302
نویسندگان
, , ,