کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1734596 | 1016159 | 2011 | 14 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
In this paper, energetic performance comparison of three trigeneration systems is presented. The systems considered are SOFC-trigeneration, biomass-trigeneration, and solar-trigeneration systems. This study compares the performance of the systems considered when there is only electrical power and the efficiency improvement of these systems when there is trigeneration. Different key output parameters are examined: energy efficiency, net electrical power, electrical to heating and cooling ratios, and (GHG) GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions. This study shows that the SOFC-trigeneration system has the highest electrical efficiency among the three systems. Alternatively, when trigeneration is used, the efficiencies of all three systems considered increase considerably. The maximum trigeneration efficiency of the SOFC-trigeneration system is around 76% while it is around 90% for the biomass-trigeneration system. On the other hand, the maximum trigeneration efficiencies of the solar-trigeneration system is around 90% for the solar mode, 45% for storage and storage mode, and 41% for the storage mode. In addition, this study shows that the emissions of CO2 in kg per MWh of electrical power are high for the biomass-trigeneration and SOFC-trigeneration systems. However, by considering the emissions per MWh of trigeneration, their values drop to less than one fourth.
► We have compared the energetic performance of three potential trigeneration systems.
► These systems are SOFC, biomass, and solar-trigeneration systems.
► The SOFC-trigeneration system has the highest electrical efficiency.
► The trigeneration efficiencies of the biomass-trigeneration system and solar mode of the solar-trigeneration system are the highest.
► The CO2 emissions per MWh of combined cooling, heating, and power production drop significantly when trigeneration is used.
Journal: Energy - Volume 36, Issue 9, September 2011, Pages 5741–5754