کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1944293 | 1053203 | 2013 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

• Flexibility reflects flexual rigidities of α-helical antimicrobial peptides (AMPs).
• Flexibility is relevant to but different from other structural properties of AMPs.
• Flexibility enhances activities of the stiff AMPs against E. coli.
• Flexibility reduces activities of the flexual AMPs against E. coli.
• Flexibility regulates AMP actions through a mechanical mechanism of pore formation.
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are recognized as the potential substitutions for common antibiotics. Flexibility has been demonstrated to be a dominant on antimicrobial activity of an AMP, similar to the structural parameters such as hydrophobicity and hydrophobic moment as well as positive charge. To better understand the effect of flexibility on antimicrobial activity, we herein examined seventy-eight peptides derived from nine different species. Defined as a weighted average of amino acid flexibility indices over whole residue chain of AMP, flexibility index was used to scale the peptide flexibility and indicated to be a reflection of mechanical properties such as tensile and flexural rigidities. The results demonstrated that flexibility index is relevant to but different from other structural properties, may enhance activity against Escherichia coli for stiff clustered peptides or reduce activity against E. coli for flexible clustered peptides, and its optimum occurs at about − 0.5. This effect of flexibility on antimicrobial activity may be involved to the antimicrobial actions, such as stable peptide-bound leaflet formation and sequent stress concentration in target cell membrane, mechanically. The present results provide a new insight in understanding antimicrobial actions and may be useful in seeking for a new structure–activity relationship for cationic and amphipathic α-helical peptides.
Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (81 K)Download as PowerPoint slide
Journal: Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes - Volume 1828, Issue 11, November 2013, Pages 2479–2486