کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2095966 1082146 2009 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
MALDI-TOF “fingerprint” phospholipid mass spectra allow the differentiation between ruminantia and feloideae spermatozoa
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک علوم دامی و جانورشناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
MALDI-TOF “fingerprint” phospholipid mass spectra allow the differentiation between ruminantia and feloideae spermatozoa
چکیده انگلیسی

The detailed comparative analysis of sperm lipids could essentially contribute to a better understanding of membrane function in the context of fertilization and, moreover, of sperm preservation. The application of sensitive analytical methods is particularly necessary for endangered species as the available amount of spermatozoa (and, accordingly, extractable lipids) is strongly limited. It will be shown that matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) is a fast, simple and sensitive method for the determination of the phospholipid composition of spermatozoa from several ruminantia (cattle, roe deer, Klipspringer) and feloideae species (domestic cat, Siberian tiger, fosa). Characteristic “fingerprints” are obtained from the positive ion spectra that allow the differentiation between both animal groups. In contrast to the lipid extracts of ruminantia spermatozoa which predominantly contain ether lipids including essential amounts of plasmalogens, the more complex phospholipid composition of feloideae spermatozoa is clearly dominated by diacyl phospholipids and contains only marginal amounts of plasmalogens. It will also be shown that the lipid compositions of ejaculated, electroejaculated and cauda epididymal spermatozoa of the same species are very similar and give comparable data. Therefore, the analysis of ejaculated spermatozoa is not an absolute must.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Theriogenology - Volume 71, Issue 4, 1 March 2009, Pages 568–575
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,