Hydro–pyro integration in the processing of nickel laterites

Hydrometallurgical process routes are seen to be the future of treatment of the lower grade nickel laterites ores. Hydrometallurgical projects of recent years have focused on HPAL and have been largely unsuccessful economically so far, with huge capital cost overruns.The simplest and least capital intensive of the possible alternatives to HPAL is atmospheric heap leaching. Development work is also underway by several companies into atmospheric tank leaching which is also a potentially viable alternative.The natural product for a leaching process is a high grade nickel intermediate either from a direct precipitation process (containing approx. 36% Ni) or via ion exchange (>50% Ni).There are many existing pyrometallurgical facilities which could easily be adapted to take this nickel intermediate giving them significant potential benefits especially as nickel laterite ore grades diminish. The nickel production from these plants could also be increased and for new plants large capital and operating cost savings achieved by using suitable intermediates.There are also potential environmental benefits with much less energy consumed and lower greenhouse gases emitted per tonne of nickel produced.In the future an integrated hydrometallurgical plant with attached existing smelter or a more advanced pyrometallurgical smelting process (e.g. a DC arc furnace) could well be the way forward for new projects.

► Hydro–pyro integration of nickel laterite processing.
► Global nickel laterite production.
► Existing and advances to state of the art of hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical nickel laterite processing.
► Hydro–pyro integration flow sheet options and case studies.
► Economics of selected case studies.