کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
233660 | 465357 | 2012 | 15 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

This work presents a numerical study of liquid–gas–solid flow in classifying hydrocyclones (CHs). In the numerical model, the turbulent flow of a liquid–gas–solid mixture is modelled using the Reynolds stress model. The interface between the liquid and air core, and the particle flow are both modelled using the mixture multiphase model under different conditions. The flow features are examined in terms of flow field, pressure drop, amount of water split to underflow, and separation efficiency. The approach is first verified by comparing the measured and calculated results. Then, it is used to investigate the effects of feed solids concentration and its fluctuation. The results show that when feed solids concentration is increased, the separation efficiency decreases while the cut size increases; the inlet pressure initially decreases to a minimum and then increases, and the amount of water split to underflow firstly increases to a maximum and then decreases. It is also shown that the air core, solid mass flowrates on the underflow and overflow, and inlet pressure drop fluctuate corresponding to feed solids fluctuation. However, the fluctuation only affects the average CH separation efficiency slightly.
A mathematical model has been developed to study classifying hydrocyclone process mainly based on the so called mixture multiphase model. The model has been used to study the effects of feed solids concentration and its fluctuation on the flow and separation efficiency of classifying hydrocyclone.Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► A mathematical model was developed to describe the multiphase flow in a classifying hydrocyclone.
► Good agreements were found between the measured and calculated results under different conditions.
► The effects of feed solids concentration and its fluctuation were quantified.
Journal: Minerals Engineering - Volume 31, May 2012, Pages 17–31