کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2549239 | 1124509 | 2012 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Direct effects of arsenic trioxide on action potentials in isolated cardiac tissues: Importance of the choice of species, type of cardiac tissue and perfusion time Direct effects of arsenic trioxide on action potentials in isolated cardiac tissues: Importance of the choice of species, type of cardiac tissue and perfusion time](/preview/png/2549239.png)
IntroductionThe aim of the present study was to evaluate direct/acute effects of arsenic trioxide on action potentials (APs) in isolated cardiac tissues, and to investigate if the choice of species and tissue and the duration of the perfusion play a role in arsenic-induced acute/direct prolongation of AP/QT.Methods and resultsDirect electrophysiological effects of arsenic trioxide were measured in cardiac tissues isolated from four different species using micro-electrode recording. Arsenic (after 30 to 95 min perfusion at 10 μM) significantly prolonged APD90, increased triangulation of the AP and elicited early afterdepolarizations (EADs) only in isolated guinea-pig and dog Purkinje fibers but not in rabbit and porcine (minipig) Purkinje fibers. Arsenic induced a prolongation of the APD90 and increases in triangulation and the occurrence of EADs was not observed in papillary muscles of guinea-pigs and rabbits. Arsenic at 4 increasing concentrations from 0.1 μM to 10 μM at the standard perfusion-time of 15 min per concentration, and after a continuous 90-min perfusion at 1 μM and 1 Hz did not induce these direct effects on APD90, triangulation and EADs in isolated guinea-pig Purkinje fibers, but it at 1 µM elicited EADs in 2 out of 7 preparations after 90 min at 0.2 Hz.DiscussionThe present study demonstrates that the choice of species and cardiac tissue as well as perfusion-time play important roles in arsenic-induced direct/acute effects on APD90 and induction of EADs in vitro.
Journal: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods - Volume 66, Issue 2, September–October 2012, Pages 135–144