کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2753178 1149619 2009 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Computed Tomography–Guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy of Pulmonary Nodules: Impact of Nodule Size on Diagnostic Accuracy
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیهوشی و پزشکی درد
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Computed Tomography–Guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy of Pulmonary Nodules: Impact of Nodule Size on Diagnostic Accuracy
چکیده انگلیسی

PurposeThis study was undertaken to compare the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of computed tomography (CT)—guided percutaneous lung biopsies of lung nodules ≤ 1.5 cm versus > 1.5 cm in diameter.Patients and MethodsA total of 139 patients (age range, 18-89 years; mean, 62.5 years) underwent CT-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy or 20-gauge core biopsy using an automated biopsy gun. In 37 patients, the lung nodule measured ≤ 1.5 cm (mean, 1.1 cm), and in 102 patients, the lung nodule was > 1.5 cm (mean, 2.8 cm). Diagnostic accuracy was determined by cytopathology results. Major and minor complications were documented.ResultsOverall diagnostic accuracy, pneumothorax rate, and thoracostomy tube insertion rates were 67.6%, 34.5%, and 5%, respectively. Of the 98 patients with malignancy, 77 patients (78.6%) had a definite diagnostic biopsy. Overall, nodules > 1.5 cm were statistically more likely to result in a diagnostic specimen (73.5%) than nodules ≤ 1.5 cm (51.4%; P = .012). Similarly, diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was higher in nodules > 1.5 cm than in those ≤ 1.5 cm (81.3% vs. 69.6%); however, this was not statistically significant. There was no correlation between nodule size and the incidence of complications.ConclusionOverall, diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy of lung nodules ≤ 1.5 cm is slightly lower than that of nodules > 1.5 cm. However, the diagnostic accuracy for malignancy is high in both groups, with a low risk of complications

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Clinical Lung Cancer - Volume 10, Issue 5, September 2009, Pages 360-363