کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2947078 1577137 2013 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Role of Aspiration and Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Angioplasty : An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Role of Aspiration and Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Angioplasty : An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectivesThis meta-analysis was designed to update data on clinical outcomes with aspiration thrombectomy or mechanical thrombectomy before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with conventional primary PCI alone.BackgroundThe clinical efficacy of thrombectomy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains uncertain.MethodsClinical trials that randomized AMI patients to aspiration (18 trials, n = 3,936) or mechanical thrombectomy (7 trials, n = 1,598) before PCI compared with conventional PCI alone were included.ResultsThe weighted mean duration of clinical follow-up was 6 months. Aspiration thrombectomy vs. conventional primary PCI (18 trials, n=3,936): Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (risk ratio [RR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63 to 0.92; p = 0.006) and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.99; p = 0.049) were significantly reduced with aspiration thrombectomy. Beneficial trends were noted for recurrent MI (p = 0.11) and target vessel revascularization (p = 0.06). Final infarct size (p = 0.64) and ejection fraction (p = 0.32) at 1 month were similar. ST-segment resolution (STR) at 60 min (RR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.48; p < 0.0001) and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction blush grade (TBG) 3 post-procedure (RR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.59; p < 0.0001) were both improved with aspiration thrombectomy. Mechanical thrombectomy vs. conventional primary PCI (7 trials, n = 1,598): there was no difference between the mechanical thrombectomy and conventional primary PCI arms in the incidence of MACE (RR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.59 to 2.05; p = 0.77), mortality (p = 0.57), recurrent MI (p = 0.32), target vessel revascularization (p = 0.19), or final infarct size (p = 0.47). A benefit in STR at 60 min (RR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.47; p = 0.007), but not TBG 3 (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.38; p = 0.48) was noted.ConclusionsThrombectomy during AMI by manual catheter aspiration, but not mechanically, is beneficial in reducing MACE, including mortality, at 6 to 12 months compared with conventional primary PCI alone.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of the American College of Cardiology - Volume 62, Issue 16, 15 October 2013, Pages 1409–1418
نویسندگان
, , , , ,