کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2963572 | 1178566 | 2010 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: A flow-limiting stenosis is the major determinant of exercise-induced myocardial stunning in patients with coronary artery disease A flow-limiting stenosis is the major determinant of exercise-induced myocardial stunning in patients with coronary artery disease](/preview/png/2963572.png)
SummaryBackgroundAlthough stress-induced myocardial stunning often develops after exercise testing, determinants of this phenomenon have not been evaluated.Methods and resultsThirty-one patients with 1-vessel coronary artery disease, limited to the left anterior descending artery (LAD), were evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intracoronary pressure measurements to calculate fractional flow reserve (FFR). In addition, electrocardiogram-gated technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial imaging was acquired >30 min after exercise and 4 h later to assess the development of stunning. Exercise-induced myocardial stunning was observed in 11 patients (35%). In patients with myocardial stunning, a summed stress score (17.3 ± 7.1 vs. 8.1 ± 6.2, p < 0.001), summed difference score (10.3 ± 4.1 vs. 2.7 ± 1.9, p < 0.0001), and wall motion difference score (4.8 ± 2.8 vs. 0.9 ± 1.1, p < 0.0001) were greater than in those without, while diameter stenosis calculated by QCA (55.1 ± 17.3% vs. 29.8 ± 17.3%, p < 0.0001) was greater and FFR reduced significantly (0.54 ± 0.13 vs. 0.83 ± 0.06, p < 0.0001). Of note, 4 out of 21 patients (19%) with <50% LAD stenosis developed myocardial stunning, whereas only one patient with FFR of 0.64 or greater showed stunning. The best cut-off value was determined as 0.64 for FFR and 46% for QCA, providing 91% sensitivity and 100% specificity for FFR (chi-square = 57.2), but 91% sensitivity and 80% specificity for diameter stenoses measured by QCA (chi-square = 17.8).ConclusionsThe major determinant for exercise-induced myocardial stunning was a severe flow-limiting coronary stenosis, which was more important than anatomical evaluation based on luminal narrowing alone.
Journal: Journal of Cardiology - Volume 55, Issue 3, May 2010, Pages 337–344