کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3344785 1214852 2015 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Does Your “Backup” Method Have Your Back? Controversies Surrounding Backup of Rapid Antigen Detection Methods for Group A Streptococcus
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری ایمنی شناسی و میکروب شناسی میکروبیولوژی و بیوتکنولوژی کاربردی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Does Your “Backup” Method Have Your Back? Controversies Surrounding Backup of Rapid Antigen Detection Methods for Group A Streptococcus
چکیده انگلیسی

Accurate diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis followed by appropriate antibiotic therapy is important for the prevention and control of group A streptococcus (GAS) infection and its sequelae. Rapid antigen detection methods (RADTs) for detection of GAS antigen are commonly used to speed the diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis; however, reports of false-negative antigen tests are common. In this review, we describe the conflicting strategies that surround GAS testing and reflexive backup testing for samples found to be negative for Streptococcus pyogenes antigen. We invite you to examine your GAS backup or reflexive testing strategy and ask yourself, “Does my laboratory's GAS backup method have my back?” More importantly, “Is reflexive testing designed to provide optimized diagnostic care for my patient population?”

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Clinical Microbiology Newsletter - Volume 37, Issue 14, 15 July 2015, Pages 111–118
نویسندگان
, ,