کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3348517 1216017 2007 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparative in vivo efficacy of meropenem, imipenem, and cefepime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa expressing MexA-MexB-OprM efflux pumps
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری ایمنی شناسی و میکروب شناسی میکروبیولوژی و بیوتکنولوژی کاربردی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Comparative in vivo efficacy of meropenem, imipenem, and cefepime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa expressing MexA-MexB-OprM efflux pumps
چکیده انگلیسی

To identify the optimal pharmacodynamic exposures of meropenem, imipenem, and cefepime, and the emergence of resistance in vivo for Pseudomonas aeruginosa overexpressing MexA-MexB-OprM efflux pumps, we used the murine thigh model. Mice were challenged with P. aeruginosa isolates: PAO1 (K767 wild type), K767+ (MexA-MexB-OprM efflux mutant), and ΔK767 (knockout strain). Efficacy (Δ log colony-forming unit [CFU]) was determined at various exposures of %T > MIC at both standard (105 CFU/thigh) and high (107 CFU/thigh) inoculums. At 105 CFU/thigh, meropenem and imipenem produced a maximal activity against PAO1 (−2.82, −1.88) and K767+ (−2.24, −2.68) at 40%T > MIC; cefepime at 70%T > MIC produced a comparable kill (−2.74 and −2.19, respectively). Similar magnitudes of kill were observed at the 107 inocula. Except for ΔK767 with cefepime, no development of resistance emerged at various %T > MIC. All agents exhibited reduced activity against ΔK767. ΔK767 cefepime-resistant strains were isolated up to 100%T > MIC. The overexpression of MexA-MexB-OprM efflux pumps did not result in the loss of efficacy of the antibiotics tested regardless of the amount of bacterial inocula; however, their presence also did not lead to increased selection for resistance. The effects of efflux mechanisms on β-lactam agents in vivo warrant further research.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease - Volume 57, Issue 2, February 2007, Pages 153–161
نویسندگان
, , , , ,