کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3362990 | 1592085 | 2013 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

SummaryBackgroundCiprofloxacin (CPFX) is a potential alternative in patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) because of its activity against Gram-negative organisms. We conducted a non-inferiority, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous CPFX and cefepime (CFPM) for FN patients with hematological malignancies.MethodsPatients aged from 15 to 79 years with an absolute neutrophil count of <0.500 × 109/l were eligible, and were randomized to receive 300 mg of CPFX or 2 g of CFPM every 12 h. Initial treatment efficacy, overall response, and early toxicity were evaluated.ResultsFifty-one episodes were included in this trial, and 49 episodes (CPFX vs. CFPM: 24 vs. 25) were evaluated. Treatment efficacy at day 7 was significantly higher in the CFPM group (successful clinical response: nine with CPFX and 19 with CFPM; p = 0.007). The response was better in high-risk patients with neutrophil counts of ≤0.100 × 109/l (p = 0.003). The overall response during the study period was similar between the CPFX and CFPM groups (p = 0.64). Adverse events were minimal, and all patients could continue the treatment.ConclusionsWe could not prove the non-inferiority of CPFX in comparison with CFPM for the initial treatment of FN. CFPM remains the standard treatment of choice for FN.
Journal: International Journal of Infectious Diseases - Volume 17, Issue 6, June 2013, Pages e385–e390