Evaluation of the new ARCHITECT anti-HCV screening test under routine laboratory conditions

BackgroundAn improved test version of the Abbott ARCHITECT anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) test became available at the end of 2005.Study designWe compared the new test version with the Ortho Vitros anti-HCV test by evaluating 2034 serum samples in parallel on both systems under routine laboratory conditions. Discordant samples were tested in the Inno-LIA HCV Score assay as well as in the RIBA HCV 3.0.ResultsOf the 2034 samples 140 (6.9%) yielded positive and 1856 (91.2%) negative results in both assays. We observed discordant results in 38 samples (1.9%). All discrepant samples showed a low S/CO ratio of 1.0–6.9 (mean 2.8) in the Ortho assay and of 1.3–3.0 (mean 1.96) in the ARCHITECT assay. As expected, most of them could not be confirmed by immunoblot testing. Comparison of the results of the two immunoblots (Inno-LIA and RIBA) revealed a great variability in test results.ConclusionsThis study represents the first comparative evaluation of the modified version of the Abbott ARCHITECT anti-HCV assay in comparison with the Ortho Vitros anti-HCV test. Under routine laboratory testing, we observed good overall concordance between the two assays and no evidence that one assay shows more false-reactive or negative results than the other.