کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3376942 1219945 2014 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Efficacy and safety of levofloxacin in patients with bacterial pneumonia evaluated according to the new “Clinical Evaluation Methods for New Antimicrobial Agents to Treat Respiratory Infections (Second Version)”
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
اثربخشی و ایمنی لووفلوکساسین در بیماران مبتلا به پنومونی باکتریایی براساس روش جدید ارزیابی بالینی برای عوامل ضد میکروبی جدید برای درمان عفونت های تنفسی (نسخه دوم) مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت.
کلمات کلیدی
لووفلوکساسین، عفونت تنفسی پنومونی به دست آمده در جامعه، مطالعه بالینی، دستورالعمل های عمومی برای ارزیابی عوامل ضد میکروبی جدید
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری ایمنی شناسی و میکروب شناسی میکروبیولوژی و بیوتکنولوژی کاربردی
چکیده انگلیسی

The guideline for the “Clinical Evaluation Methods for New Antimicrobial Agents to Treat Respiratory Infections (Second Version),” published by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy in January 2012, was proposed to achieve consistency with FDA guidelines based on the concept of clinical evaluation used in Japan. We assessed the clinical efficacy of levofloxacin (LVFX) in patients with bacterial pneumonia according to this new set of guidelines for the first time.The clinical efficacy of LVFX in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) at the test of cure (TOC) was 87.5% (56/64) and 85.7% (6/7), respectively, with an overall efficacy of 87.3% (62/71). The clinical efficacy of LVFX at TOC was as follows: intravenous 81.5% (22/27), oral 88.9% (24/27), switchover from intravenous to oral administration 100% (10/10), respectively. The bacterial eradication rate in the patients with CAP and HCAP and overall efficacy at the end of therapy (EOT) was 95.3% (41/43), 100.0% (4/4) and 95.7% (45/47), respectively. The frequent causative bacterial strains included Streptococcus pneumoniae (18), Haemophilus influenzae (14) and Moraxella catarrhalis (6). The incidence of adverse reactions in the patients whose safety was evaluated was 15.7% (14/89), similar to that previously reported.The clinical efficacy of LVFX at the early phase, EOT and TOC of CAP, as assessed according to the new and former guidelines, was 70.4% (38/54) and 27.8% (15/54), 87.0% (60/69) and 79.1% (53/67), 87.5% (56/64) and 88.1% (59/67), respectively, with no significant differences. Therefore, the new efficacy evaluation method can be used in exchange for the former evaluation method.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy - Volume 20, Issue 7, July 2014, Pages 417–422
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , ,