کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
375309 622685 2012 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Technology assessment for wastewater treatment using multiple-attribute decision-making
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی مدیریت، کسب و کار و حسابداری کسب و کار و مدیریت بین المللی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Technology assessment for wastewater treatment using multiple-attribute decision-making
چکیده انگلیسی

A framework for technology assessment for wastewater treatment is proposed in this work. A case study of technology selection for high rise buildings in urban centres of India is used for evaluation and to test this framework. The multiple-attribute decision-making technique is used for ranking the alternatives. The three most commonly used wastewater treatment technologies viz., activated sludge process (ASP), sequencing batch reactors (SBR) and membrane bio-reactor (MBR) are evaluated. Seven criteria having indicators derived from life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC) and criteria accounting for resource constraints, robustness of the system and sustainability are used for the evaluations. The technology assessment framework used in this work will help identify appropriate wastewater treatment technologies for various decision-making situations encountered while managing wastewaters. Importantly, this study validates the theory that it is the decision situation which decides the appropriateness of the technology and not the technology itself. Hence, the definition of appropriate technology given by Murphy et al. [4] is more convincing for water and sanitation technologies.


► Technology assessment framework for wastewater treatment technologies is developed.
► Wastewater treatment technology selection problem is addressed.
► Appropriate wastewater treatment technology is identified for urban areas in India.
► Multiple-attribute decision-making approach is developed.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Technology in Society - Volume 34, Issue 4, November 2012, Pages 295–302
نویسندگان
, , ,