کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3814078 | 1245991 | 2008 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
ObjectiveTo illustrate how the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) can be used to promote shared decision-making and enhance clinician–patient communication.MethodsTutorial review.ResultsThe AHP promotes shared decision-making by creating a framework that is used to define the decision, summarize the information available, prioritize information needs, elicit preferences and values, and foster meaningful communication among decision stakeholders.ConclusionsThe AHP and related multi-criteria methods have the potential for improving the quality of clinical decisions and overcoming current barriers to implementing shared decision-making in busy clinical settings. Further research is needed to determine the best way to implement these tools and to determine their effectiveness.Practice implicationsMany clinical decisions involve preference-based trade-offs between competing risks and benefits. The AHP is a well-developed method that provides a practical approach for improving patient–provider communication, clinical decision-making, and the quality of patient care in these situations.
Journal: Patient Education and Counseling - Volume 73, Issue 3, December 2008, Pages 418–425