کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
3825622 | 1246829 | 2011 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

SummaryObjectiveTo identify the prevalence of clinically significant prescription errors in a Brazilian university hospital compared with their occurrence in 2003 and 2007.MethodsVariables and group of variables, such as readability, compliance with legal and institutional procedures of prescription, and prescription errors analysis were analyzed.ResultsWhen the prevalence rates of clinically significant prescription errors were calculated, a statistically significant decrease was shown [year of 2003 (29.25%), year of 2007 (24.20%); (z = 2.99; p = 0.03)], reflecting on the safety rate [year of 2003 (70.75%), year of 2007 (75.80%); (z = 3.30; p = 0.0001)].ConclusionDespite significant, the increased safety rate reflected the quantitative reduction of errors, with no observed difference in severity between the studied periods. Our results suggest the institutional steps taken could reduce the number of errors, but they were ineffective in reducing the severity of the errors.
Journal: Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (English Edition) - Volume 57, Issue 3, May–June 2011, Pages 301-308