کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4050477 | 1264933 | 2012 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: A novel intramedullary nail for micromotion stimulation of tibial fractures A novel intramedullary nail for micromotion stimulation of tibial fractures](/preview/png/4050477.png)
BackgroundAnimal studies and clinical trials have suggested that early application of controlled axial micromotion can accelerate healing of long bone fractures compared to rigid fixation. However, experimental investigations of micromotion constructs have been limited to external fixators, which have a higher incidence of complications than intramedullary nails. The purpose of this study was to assess whether a novel intramedullary nail design can generate stimulatory micromotion under minimal weight-bearing loads typical of the early healing period.MethodsEight cadaver tibiae were reamed, osteotomised, and implanted with commercially-available IM nails fitted with a custom insert that allowed 1 mm of axial micromotion after proximal/distal interlocking. Specimens were mounted in a materials testing machine and subjected to cyclic axial loading while interfragmentary motion was measured using an extensometer. Implants were also tested in standard statically-locked mode.FindingsThe average force required to cause distraction of the fracture gap in micromotion mode was 37.0 (SD 21.7) N. The mean construct stiffness was 1046.8 (SD 193.6) N/mm in static locking mode and 512.4 (SD 99.6) N/mm in micromotion mode (significantly different, P < 0.001).InterpretationThese results support the development of a micromotion-enabled IM nail because the forces required to cause interfragmentary movements are very low, less than the weight of the hanging shank and foot. In contrast to rigid-fixation nails, which require significant weight-bearing to induce interfragmentary motion, the micromotion-enabled nail may allow movement in non-weight-bearing patients during the early healing period when the benefits of mechanical stimulation are most critical.
Journal: Clinical Biomechanics - Volume 27, Issue 2, February 2012, Pages 182–188