A Randomized Trial Comparing Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing vs Ceramic-on-Crossfire-Polyethylene Bearing Surfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundBearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty (THA) may affect implant longevity and hence patient outcomes. This randomized clinical trial determined how ceramic-on-ceramic (CERAMIC) bearing THA affected joint-specific pain, function, and stiffness and prosthesis fixation/longevity over 10 postoperative years compared with ceramic-on-highly-crosslinked-polyethylene (POLYETHYLENE) bearing THA. This is a follow-up to previously reported 5-year outcomes.MethodsSubjects aged <61 years were randomized to CERAMIC (n = 48) or POLYETHYLENE (n = 44) THA. Subjects were assessed using the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index and the RAND 12-Item Health Survey preoperatively, and at 1, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. Plain radiographs were evaluated at 10 years for fixation, and medical records were reviewed for revisions.ResultsOf 92 subjects, 6 (7%) died within 10 years; 68 (79%) survivors provided radiographic and/or clinical follow-up at 10 years postoperatively. Improvements seen at 5 years in both the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index and RAND 12-Item Health Survey were retained at 10 years with no group differences (P > .48). There were no failures or loss of fixation related to bearing surfaces/wear in either group. Over 10 years, 3 subjects in the POLYETHYLENE group had revisions that were related to recurrent dislocation; 2 revisions were performed within 2 years of surgery, and one further subject underwent revision at 7 years postoperatively.ConclusionsThis is one of the first randomized clinical trials to examine 10-year outcomes between CERAMIC and POLYETHYLENE bearing THAs. Both bearing surfaces performed well out to 10 years in subjects who were <61 years at time of surgery.