کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4062104 1604029 2012 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A Comparison of Outcomes With and Without a Tourniquet in Total Knee Arthroplasty : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی ارتوپدی، پزشکی ورزشی و توانبخشی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
A Comparison of Outcomes With and Without a Tourniquet in Total Knee Arthroplasty : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
چکیده انگلیسی

A tourniquet is often used in total knee arthroplasty resulting in improved visualization of structures, reduced intraoperative bleeding and better cementation. The risks include deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. To quantify the case for or against tourniquet use, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of selected randomized controlled trials. Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. Of the 8 outcomes analyzed (surgery duration; total, intraoperative, and postoperative blood losses; deep vein thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; and minor/major complications), the total and intraoperative blood losses were less using a tourniquet. Minor complications were more common in the tourniquet group. The remaining outcomes showed no difference between the groups. Using a tourniquet may be beneficial, but long-term studies of outcome are needed.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The Journal of Arthroplasty - Volume 27, Issue 3, March 2012, Pages 331–340
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,