کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4074117 1266999 2014 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Electrothermal arthroscopic capsulorrhaphy: old technology, new evidence. A multicenter randomized clinical trial
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
الکتروترمال کپورولاکتریال آرتروسکوپی: تکنولوژی قدیمی، شواهد جدید. یک کارآزمایی بالینی تصادفی چند محوری
کلمات کلیدی
سطح دوم، آزمایش تصادفی کنترل شده، درمان درمانی شولدر، بی ثباتی چند جهته، سقط جنین، باز کردن حرکت کپسول پایین الکتروترمال کپورپورپاشی آرتروسکوپی، افزونگی کپسول، کیفیت زندگی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی ارتوپدی، پزشکی ورزشی و توانبخشی
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundRadiofrequency technology for shoulder instability was rapidly adopted despite limited clinical evidence and a poor understanding of its indications. Reports of serious adverse events followed, leading to its abandonment. This paper presents findings from a multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of electrothermal arthroscopic capsulorrhaphy (ETAC) compared with open inferior capsular shift (ICS) and reviews the role of randomized trials in adopting new technology.MethodsPatients (>14 years) diagnosed with multidirectional instability or multidirectional laxity with anteroinferior instability and failed nonoperative treatment were enrolled. Patients with bone lesions or labral, biceps anchor, or full-thickness rotator cuff tears were excluded intraoperatively. Outcomes included Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, function and recurrent instability at 2 years postoperatively, and surgical times.ResultsFifty-four subjects (mean age, 23 years; 37 women) were randomized to ETAC (n = 28) or open ICS (n = 26). The groups were comparable at baseline, except for external rotation at the side. At 2 years postoperatively, there were no statistically or clinically significant differences between groups for the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (P = .71), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (P = .43), Constant score (P = .43), and active range of motion. Recurrent instability was not statistically different (ETAC, 2; open, 4; P = .41). ETAC (23 minutes) was significantly shorter than open ICS (59 minutes) (P < .01) surgery. Three subjects (1 ETAC, 2 open) had stiff shoulders.ConclusionsAt 2 years postoperatively, quality of life and functional outcomes between groups were not clinically different. ETAC had fewer complications and episodes of recurrence compared with open surgery. This evidence reinforces the need to critically evaluate new technology before widespread clinical use.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery - Volume 23, Issue 8, August 2014, Pages 1171–1180
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , ,