کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4074771 | 1267020 | 2011 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

BackgroundData on venous thromboembolic (VTE) events after different types of shoulder surgery have not previously been available in large numbers in the United Kingdom. We aimed to determine baseline postoperative complication rates with reference to national thromboembolic prophylaxis guidelines.MethodsDiagnostic and operative codes are routinely collected on every patient admitted to the hospital in the English NHS. Data for a 42-month period were analyzed for planned shoulder surgery (total replacement, hemiarthroplasty, or arthroscopy) and proximal humeral fracture surgery (internal fixation or replacement). In addition, complications during the two 6-month periods before and after the implementation of national thromboprophylaxis guidelines were compared. Rates of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and mortality within 90 days were extracted.ResultsFor total shoulder replacement (4,061 patients), deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and mortality rates were 0%, 0.20%, and 0.22%, respectively. For arthroscopic procedures (65,302 patients), the rates were less than 0.01%, 0.01%, and 0.03%, respectively. For proximal humeral fracture surgery (internal fixation or replacement, 4,696 patients), the rates were 0.19%, 0.40%, and 3.02%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the VTE event or mortality rates before and after the introduction of the 2007 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines after arthroscopy or proximal humeral fracture surgery. A statistically significant decrease in total shoulder replacement–related mortality was found, from 0.72% (5 patients) to 0%.DiscussionVTE disease is not a significant problem after shoulder surgery, and thromboprophylaxis may not be required, even in high-risk patients. National thromboprophylaxis guidelines did not affect VTE event rates.
Journal: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery - Volume 20, Issue 5, July 2011, Pages 764–770