کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4119134 | 1270347 | 2011 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Salvage (tertiary) breast reconstruction after implant failure Salvage (tertiary) breast reconstruction after implant failure](/preview/png/4119134.png)
SummaryBackgroundSalvage breast reconstruction is defined as a complete revision of a previous reconstruction in case of unsatisfactory results or failure of primary or secondary breast reconstruction. We have termed this ‘tertiary breast reconstruction’. This article presents our experience with tertiary reconstructions, including the indications, method of reconstruction and outcomes.MethodsA retrospective note review was performed for all patients who underwent breast reconstruction with autologous tissue under one surgeon between 2002 and 2009 at the University Hospital, Ghent. Out of these 688 patients, 54 patients (7.8%) required tertiary surgery with autologous tissue after failure of implant breast reconstruction.ResultsThe first reconstructive surgery involved 38 unilateral and 16 bilateral cases with a total of 70 operated breasts. A further 11 breasts were reconstructed following risk-reducing mastectomy or at the patient’s request for aesthetic reasons. Out of 81 free-flap reconstructions, the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap was the most harvested at 66 (81%). The mean ± SD operating time was 7.2 ± 1.8 h and the mean hospital stay was 7.2 ± 1.9 days. One total flap loss (1.2%) occurred. The mean follow-up was 31 months with a range between 3 months and 6 years. During follow-up, 30 patients (55.5%) needed secondary procedures to improve the aesthetic outcome. Donor-site corrections were performed in 18 patients (33%). Revisions of the breast flap were performed in 29 patients (53%).ConclusionsRestoring the breast envelope and footprint, in addition to excision of scar tissue, is the key step in breast reconstruction. Further corrections are required depending on the amount of the initial damage to the breast or subsequent postoperative complications.
Journal: Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery - Volume 64, Issue 3, March 2011, Pages 353–359