کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4163813 1274315 2011 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Effectiveness of biofeedback for dysfunctional elimination syndrome in pediatrics: A systematic review
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی پریناتولوژی (پزشکی مادر و جنین)، طب اطفال و بهداشت کودک
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Effectiveness of biofeedback for dysfunctional elimination syndrome in pediatrics: A systematic review
چکیده انگلیسی

PurposeDysfunctional elimination syndrome is associated with an inability to effectively empty the bladder and may present with UTI, incontinence, intestinal constipation or other voiding symptoms. Biofeedback has emerged as one potentially effective and non-invasive treatment. We sought to analyze if biofeedback is an effective method to treat children less than 18 years of age.MethodsA literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database, AUA, CUA, AAP and ESPU abstracts. Copies of all relevant articles were retrieved for quality assessment and data abstraction by two independent reviewers. Primary outcomes were UTIs and daytime incontinence.Results27 studies were included (1 RCT and 26 case-series). The pooled estimate showed 83% (95% CI: 79%–86%) and 80% (95% CI: 76%–85%) improvement in UTI and daytime incontinence respectively. I2 statistic showed “Low” (7%) and “High” (77%) heterogeneity across studies results for UTI and daytime incontinence. The only included RCT favored biofeedback over standard therapy (RR 1.4, 95% CI: 0.98–2.00) but this was not statistically significant. On analysis of all included studies there was also improvement in constipation (18%–100%), frequency (67%–100%), urgency (71%–88%) and VUR (21%–100%). PVR improvement ranged from 26 ml to 99 ml and Qmax improvement was from 3.1 ml/s–4.7 ml/s.ConclusionBased on this review, biofeedback is an effective, non-invasive method of treating dysfunctional elimination syndrome, and approximately 80% of children benefited from this treatment. However, most reports were of low level of evidence and studies of more solid design such as RCT should be conducted.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Pediatric Urology - Volume 7, Issue 3, June 2011, Pages 342–348
نویسندگان
, , , , ,