کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4211931 1280656 2008 18 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Use of a preference-based measure of health (EQ-5D) in COPD and asthma
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی پزشکی ریوی و تنفسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Use of a preference-based measure of health (EQ-5D) in COPD and asthma
چکیده انگلیسی

SummaryBackgroundEQ-5D is a generic preference-based measure of health that can help to understand the impact of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this paper was to synthesize literature on the validity and reliability of EQ-5D use in studies of asthma and COPD, and estimate EQ-5D utility scores associated with stage of disease.MethodsA structured search was conducted in EMBASE and MEDLINE (1988–2007) using keywords relevant to respiratory disease and EQ-5D. Original research studies in asthma or COPD that reported EQ-5D results and/or psychometric properties were included.ResultsStudies that reported psychometric properties supported the construct validity, test–retest reliability, and responsiveness of EQ-5D in asthma (seven studies) and COPD (nine studies), although some evidence of ceiling effects were observed in asthma studies. In asthma studies that reported summary scores (n=11), EQ-5D index-based scores ranged from 0.42 (SD 0.30) to 0.93 (SD not reported). In COPD studies (n=8), scores ranged from 0.52 (SD 0.16) to 0.84 (SD 0.15). While few asthma studies reported scores by severity level, sufficient studies in COPD were available to calculate pooled mean utility scores according to GOLD stage: stage I=0.74 (0.62–0.87), stage II=0.74 (0.66–0.83), stage III=0.69 (0.60–0.78) and stage IV=0.61 (0.44–0.77) (most severe).ConclusionsEvidence generally supported the validity and reliability of EQ-5D in asthma and COPD. Utility scores associated with COPD stage may be useful for modeling health outcomes in economic evaluations of treatments for COPD.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Respiratory Medicine - Volume 102, Issue 4, April 2008, Pages 519–536
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,