Appendicitis outcomes are better at resident teaching institutions: a multi-institutional analysis

BackgroundThis study compared the outcomes of appendicitis between teaching and nonteaching institutions.MethodsA retrospective review was performed of all appendicitis patients aged >18 years from 1998 to 2007. The outcomes from 2 teaching institutions (each with its own general surgery residency program) were compared with those from 11 nonteaching institutions. Study outcomes included postoperative morbidity and length of hospitalization.ResultsA total of 3,242 patients were treated at the teaching institutions (mean age, 41 years; 61% men) and 14,483 at the nonteaching institutions (mean age, 38 years; 54% men). The perforated appendicitis rate was 29% at the teaching institution and 28% at the nonteaching institutions (P = .20). For nonperforated appendicitis, there was no difference in the incidence of wound infection between the teaching and nonteaching institutions (2.7% vs 2.3%, P = .30). There was a lower rate of abscess drainage (.4% vs 1%, P = .02), a lower readmission rate (1.7% vs 3.5%, P < .0001), and shorter lengths of stay (1.7 ± 1.5 vs 1.8 ± 1.6 days, P = .002) at teaching institutions. For perforated appendicitis, there were also lower rates of wound infection (4.8% vs 7%, P = .03), abscess drainage (4.9% vs 10%, P < .0001), and need for readmission (4.2% vs 8.4%, P < .0001) at the teaching hospitals. The lengths of stay were similar (5.0 ± 4.2 vs 5.2 ± 3.1 days, P = .30). Use of laparoscopy was lower and nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis higher at the teaching hospitals.ConclusionsTeaching institutions were more likely to perform appendectomy using an open technique and to manage perforated appendicitis nonoperatively. Infectious complications and readmission rates for both perforated and nonperforated appendicitis were lower at teaching institutions.