کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4279934 | 1611548 | 2010 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus screening and eradication in the surgical intensive care unit: Is it worth it? Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus screening and eradication in the surgical intensive care unit: Is it worth it?](/preview/png/4279934.png)
BackgroundThe problem of intensive care unit methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections has led to routine surveillance and eradication strategies.MethodsOur surgical intensive care unit (SICU) admissions receive MRSA nares cultures and if positive are isolated followed by eradication treatment. This strategy was retrospectively reviewed.ResultsOur nares-positive culture rate was 21% (30/145), and the sputum positive (sputum+) rate was 18% (26/145). Positive nares culture (Nares+) was eradicated in 63%. The rate of sputum+ in Nares+ patients was 36% (9/25). The rate of sputum+ in Nares− was 10% (12/115; P = .003). The sputum+ SICU length of stay (LOS) (18 ± 12 days in 23 S+ patients) is longer than in sputum− (10 ± 9 days in 69 S-patients, P = .0002).ConclusionsThis SICU has high rates of both nares and sputum MRSA cultures. Our data suggest eradicating nares colonization may prevent pneumonia and might decrease SICU LOS.
Journal: The American Journal of Surgery - Volume 200, Issue 6, December 2010, Pages 827–831