Paired-associative stimulation can modulate muscle fatigue induced motor cortex excitability changes

The aim of this study was to examine whether the changes of the motor cortex excitability induced by muscle fatigue could be affected by prior or subsequent intervention protocol supposed to induce opposing excitability changes. For this purpose we used paired associative stimulation (PAS) method, where peripheral nerve stimuli were associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex at a fixed interstimulus interval of 25 ms. The PAS protocol used is known to produce a long lasting, long-term potentiation (LTP) like change of cortical plasticity manifested by significant increase in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) amplitude. In this study, we confirmed significant MEP size reduction following fatigue, which had been already reported in the literature. When PAS was applied either immediately before or after muscle fatigue protocol, the excitability changes were largely occluded and MEP sizes remained close to baseline levels. However, in spite of the effects on cortical excitability, conditioning with PAS did not cause any change in target fatigue measure, the endurance point, which remained the same as when fatiguing protocol was applied alone. The present results demonstrate that fatigue-related changes in cortical excitability can be modulated by either prior or subsequent excitability promoting activity. They also suggest that muscle fatigue associated changes in motor cortical excitability probably represent non-specific activity-related plasticity, rather than a direct expression of the so-called central fatigue.

► Depression of corticospinal excitability following muscle fatigue can be modulated by another excitability promoting procedure delivered either prior or post fatigue without direct effect on behavioral fatigue level.
► The results suggest that depression in corticospinal excitability does not directly correspond with central fatigue.
► The results suggest that depression in corticospinal excitability is not an electrophysiological correlate of a learning process.
► Most likely, depression in corticospinal excitability following muscle fatigue is a homeostatic adaptation preventing development of maladaptive plasticity.