کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4370139 | 1616760 | 2006 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
In Australian export-registered abattoirs microbiological monitoring is carried out within the E. coli and Salmonella Monitoring (ESAM) program. During the calendar year 2003, the ESAM database indicated a national prevalence of Escherichia coli of around 3.0% for steers/heifers and 7.1% for cows/bulls. An investigation was carried out to attempt to elucidate why some establishments had E. coli prevalence markedly higher or markedly lower than the national average. The investigation was based on a questionnaire completed by fifteen export establishments which provided data on livestock, processing, operator training and management. The responses were verified by site visits and then evaluated for their relationship with ESAM data on E. coli in two stages. In stage 1, E. coli prevalence for each abattoir was plotted against each variable recorded by the questionnaire; no single variable was a reasonable predictor for prevalence of E. coli on carcases. In stage 2, variables influencing contamination were grouped under two categories: contamination on incoming livestock (Problem variables) together with the ability of the plant's process to deal with such contamination (Process variables). The analysis prompted two main conclusions. Firstly, plants with a large incoming problem with livestock (long haul, high tag score and proportion of cows/bulls slaughtered) plus “poor” processes had higher than average E. coli prevalence. Secondly, plants with hot water decontamination systems had low E. coli prevalence even when there was a substantial incoming problem with livestock, such as a relatively high proportion of cows/bulls.
Journal: International Journal of Food Microbiology - Volume 111, Issue 3, 1 October 2006, Pages 263–269