کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4419324 | 1618942 | 2015 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Ecotoxicity of residual dyes present in industrial wastewaters were surveyed.
• Reactive Red 120 dye was retained using polyethylenimine enhanced ultrafiltration.
• Effects of pH, polymer loading, pressure, and cross-flow rate were analyzed.
• Response surface-optimized process conditions achieved 99% dye rejection.
• Permeate flux profiles for varying pH and transmembrane pressures were examined.
Retention of toxic dyes with molecular weights lower than the molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of the ultrafiltration membranes can be improved through selective binding of the target dyes to a water-soluble polymer, followed by ultrafiltration of the macromolecular complexes formed. This method, often referred to as polymer enhanced ultrafiltration (PEUF), was investigated in the present study, using polyethyleneimine (PEI) as the chelating agent. Model azo dye Reactive Red 120 was selected as the poorly biodegradable, target contaminant, because of its frequent recalcitrant presence in colored effluents, and its eventual ecotoxicological impacts on the environment. The effects of the governing process factors, namely, cross flow rate, transmembrane pressure polymer to dye ratio and pH, on target dye rejection efficiency were meticulously examined. Additionally, each parameter level was statistically optimized using central composite design (CCD) from the response surface methodology (RSM) toolkit, with an objective to maximize performance efficiency. The results revealed high dye retention efficiency over 99%, accompanied with reasonable permeate flux over 100 L/m2 h under optimal process conditions. The estimated results were elucidated graphically through response surface (RS) plots and validated experimentally. The analyses clearly established PEUF as a novel, reasonably efficient and economical route for recalcitrant dye treatment.
Journal: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety - Volume 121, November 2015, Pages 271–278