کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4449546 1620498 2017 16 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A multi-sensor study of the impact of ground-based glaciogenic seeding on clouds and precipitation over mountains in Wyoming. Part II: Seeding impact analysis
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
یک مطالعه چندحسگر از تاثیر بذر glaciogenic زمین پایه بر روی ابرها و بارش روی کوه در وایومینگ. بخش دوم: تجزیه و تحلیل تاثیر بذر پاشی
کلمات کلیدی
ضریب تأثیر بازتاب؛ PIF، ضریب تاثیر بارش؛ رادار میکرو باران
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه علوم زمین و سیارات علم هواشناسی
چکیده انگلیسی

Highlight
• Shallow orographic clouds were glaciogenically seeded in Wyoming, USA.
• Three different radar systems including an airborne cloud radar were deployed.
• These radars reveal an increase in low level reflectivity.
• The concentration of ice crystals increased at flight level in the target region.

The AgI Seeding Cloud Impact Investigation (ASCII) campaign, conducted in early 2012 and 2013 over two mountain ranges in southern Wyoming, was designed to examine the impact of ground-based glaciogenic seeding on snow growth in winter orographic clouds. Part I of this study (Pokharel and Geerts, 2016) describes the project design, instrumentation, as well as the ambient atmospheric conditions and macrophysical and microphysical properties of the clouds sampled in ASCII. This paper (Part II) explores how the silver iodide (AgI) seeding affects snow growth in these orographic clouds in up to 27 intensive operation periods (IOPs), depending on the instrument used.In most cases, 2 h without seeding (NOSEED) were followed by 2 h of seeding (SEED). In situ data at flight level (2D-probes) indicate higher concentrations of small snow particles during SEED in convective clouds. The double difference of radar reflectivity Z (SEED − NOSEED in the target region, compared to the same trend in the control region) indicates an increase in Z for the composite of ASCII cases, over either mountain range, and for any of the three radar systems (WCR, MRR, and DOW), each with their own control and target regions, and for an array of snow gauges. But this double difference varies significantly from case to case, which is attributed to uncertainties related to sampling representativeness and to differences in natural trends between control and target regions. We conclude that a sample much larger than ASCII's sample is needed for clear observational evidence regarding the sensitivity of seeding efficacy to atmospheric and cloud conditions.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Atmospheric Research - Volume 183, 1 January 2017, Pages 42–57
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,