Neighbor defoliation regulates Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in pasture by mediating interspecific competition

Little is known of the effect of selective plant defoliation at different intensities and frequencies in altering weed-forage dynamics in pasture. We conducted a field experiment to quantify Cirsium arvense responses to varying defoliation regimes of neighboring forage implemented for 2 years under high or low fertility conditions. Defoliation regimes were based on common grazing systems, and included: (1) high intensity–high frequency (HIHF) defoliation simulating continuous grazing, (2) high intensity–low frequency (HILF), (3) low intensity–high frequency (LIHF), and (4) deferred (DEF) defoliation to peak growth in late summer. All vegetation except C. arvense was defoliated during the growing season to examine weed responses to changes in neighboring forage abundance. Year-end C. arvense biomass at the end of the study was greatest in the HIHF treatment and lowest in the DEF, with the LIHF and HILF treatments intermediate in response. The HILF treatment also provided improved suppression of C. arvense biomass relative to the LIHF, although this response was inconsistent among sites. Trends in C. arvense shoot densities among defoliation treatments were similar to those for biomass. While weed abundance was lower in the absence of fertilization, rankings among defoliation treatments remained the same. Notably, trends in forage biomass among defoliation regimes followed a pattern opposite that of C. arvense, and are implicated in observed weed decreases. Our results indicate that defoliation regimes enhancing forage growth and biomass, particularly a DEF or HILF regime, reduce C. arvense the most. Grazing systems that employ these defoliation regimes are therefore likely to optimize the interspecific competitive suppression of C. arvense.

Research highlights
► Cirsium arvense abundance varied among neighboring defoliation regimes, regardless of fertility.
► Deferred defoliation minimized C. arvense, followed by a high intensity–low frequency regime.
► Frequent defoliation at all intensities led to high C. arvense.
► Variation in the weed was inversely related to forage yields, implicating competitive suppression.
► Grazing that employs deferred or high intensity–low frequency defoliation will minimize C. arvense.