کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4508000 | 1321399 | 2006 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Weed control and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) response to sulfentrazone
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک
علوم زراعت و اصلاح نباتات
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله

چکیده انگلیسی
Field experiments were conducted at several Texas peanut growing regions during the 1999 and 2000 growing seasons to study weed control and peanut response to sulfentrazone. Sulfentrazone applied preplant incorporated (PPI) or preemergence (PRE) caused up to 80% peanut stunt when rated 4-5 weeks after planting (WAP). The severity of stunting increased as sulfentrazone dose increased. Panicum texanum control was less than 40% regardless of dose. Cyperus esculentus control with sulfentrazone was better in south Texas than west Texas. In south Texas, C. esculentus was controlled at least 93% with sulfentrazone at 0.11Â kg/ha or higher applied PPI or PRE when rated 4 and 12 WAP. Sulfentrazone at 0.06Â kg/ha applied PPI controlled C. esculentus 93% 4 WAP but only 78% 14 WAP. The same dose of sulfentrazone applied PRE controlled yellow nutsedge 75% 4 WAP and 89% 14 WAP. In west Texas, C. esculentus control never exceeded 65% during the growing season regardless of dose or application timing. Ipomoea lacunosa control with sulfentrazone at 0.17 or 0.22Â kg/ha was at least 90% season-long at both locations regardless of dose or application timing. The use of sulfentrazone in peanut in Texas is not recommended as it causes unacceptable crop stunting at the doses necessary for adequate control of various weeds.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Crop Protection - Volume 25, Issue 8, August 2006, Pages 753-757
Journal: Crop Protection - Volume 25, Issue 8, August 2006, Pages 753-757
نویسندگان
W. James Grichar, Brent A. Besler, Peter A. Dotray,