کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4508026 1321400 2007 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Effect of citrus leaf-miner damage, mechanical damage and inoculum concentration on severity of symptoms of Asiatic citrus canker in Tahiti lime
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک علوم زراعت و اصلاح نباتات
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Effect of citrus leaf-miner damage, mechanical damage and inoculum concentration on severity of symptoms of Asiatic citrus canker in Tahiti lime
چکیده انگلیسی

Citriculture in São Paulo State, Brazil, is threatened by Asiatic citrus canker (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri). The introduction of the Asian citrus leaf miner (Phyllocnistis citrella [CLM]) has resulted in an increase in the number of disease foci and has changed the spatial pattern of citrus canker symptomatic trees from strong aggregation to intermediate aggregation and random patterns. We evaluated the effect of inoculum concentration (101, 102, 104 and 106 colony forming units (cfu) ml−1) on infection of leaves of Tahiti lime (Citrus latifolia) with three distinct treatments: (1) intact leaves, (2) mechanically wounded leaves, and (3) leaves exhibiting injuries from CLM at the egg stage, first instar, third instar, and pupal stages. The minimum inoculum concentration to cause symptom development in intact leaves was 104 cfu ml−1; in mechanically wounded leaves and in leaves with CLM injury at the egg stage and first instar stage, 102 cfu ml−1; in leaves with CLM injuries at the third instar and pupa stage, 101 cfu ml−1. The injuries from the third instar and pupa stages resulted in greater disease severity than other treatments at all inoculum concentrations (five times higher than in the intact leaf). Disease severity in leaves with mechanical wounding and with CLM injuries caused at the egg and first instar stages did not differ from intact leaves.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Crop Protection - Volume 26, Issue 2, February 2007, Pages 59–65
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,