کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4508083 1321405 2006 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Evaluation of different species of fish for biological control of golden apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck) in rice
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک علوم زراعت و اصلاح نباتات
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Evaluation of different species of fish for biological control of golden apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck) in rice
چکیده انگلیسی

The concept of rice–fish farming was employed to evaluate five species of fish for biological control of golden apple snail in rice. Aquaria trials were initially used to observe the predation potential of the individual fish species, followed by replicated field trials. In the aquaria studies all the fish species preyed upon the hatchlings of the golden apple snail, but at the field level only common carp and African catfish consumed snails significantly more than the other species. Common carp, which attained a recovery rate of 90% was the only fish species suitable for biological control of snail in rice. African catfish was not adaptable to the rice field conditions; the fish suffered a low recovery rate of 17% even when the plots were covered with nets to protect the fish from natural predators. The density of common carp recommended for biological control of snail in rice was 2041 fish/ha. However, it was essential to set up a pond refuge to improve survival rate and to enhance fish production. The study revealed that under direct seeding planting method, the increase in plant density restricted the foraging activities of the fish. Consequently, the number of snail sampled in direct seeded plots was significantly greater than in transplanted plots. Throughout the studies, the fish neither caused a significant increase in rice yields nor a reduction in stem borer, case worm and stink bug infestations. Common carp was however, an effective predator of the golden apple snail in rice.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Crop Protection - Volume 25, Issue 9, September 2006, Pages 1004–1012
نویسندگان
,