کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4526051 | 1323810 | 2011 | 14 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Parameters of functions to describe soil hydraulic properties are derived from measurements by means of parameter estimation. Of crucial importance here is the choice of correct constraints in the parameter space. Often, the parameters are mere shape parameters without physical meaning, giving flexibility to the model. A fundamental requirement is that the hydraulic functions are monotonic: the retention function and the conductivity function can only decrease as the capillary suction increases. A stricter physical requirement for the conductivity function is that its decrease with respect to saturation is at least linear. This linear decrease would occur if all pores of a capillary bundle had an equal radius. In the first part of this contribution, we derive constraints for the so-called tortuosity parameter of the Mualem conductivity model, which allow highest possible flexibility on one hand and guarantee physical consistency on the other hand. In combination with the retention functions of Brooks and Corey, van Genuchten, or Durner, such a constraint can be expressed as a function of the pore-size distribution parameters. In the second part, we show that a common modification of retention models, which is applied to reach zero water content at finite suction, can lead to the physically unrealistic case of increasing water content with increasing suction. We propose a solution for this problem by slightly modifying these models and introducing a correct parameter constraint.
► Flexible parameter estimation constraints for hydraulic functions are given.
► Monotonicity of K functions by Mualem’s model is guaranteed for τ > −2.
► For van Genuchten–Mualem, constraint for τ depends on pore-size distribution.
► Fayer–Simmons type retention functions can be non-monotonic.
► A modification which guarantees monotonicity of Fayer–Simmon functions is given.
Journal: Advances in Water Resources - Volume 34, Issue 10, October 2011, Pages 1352–1365