کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4564868 1330952 2008 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Optimization of a chocolate-flavored, peanut–soy beverage using response surface methodology (RSM) as applied to consumer acceptability data
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک دانش تغذیه
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Optimization of a chocolate-flavored, peanut–soy beverage using response surface methodology (RSM) as applied to consumer acceptability data
چکیده انگلیسی

Optimization of a chocolate-flavored, peanut–soy beverage was done using response surface methodology (RSM). Twenty-eight beverage formulations were processed by mixing three basic ingredients: peanut (X1=30.6 g/100 g–58.7 g/100 g), soy (X2=28.3 g/100 g–43.5 g/100 g), and chocolate syrup (X3=13.0 g/100 g–25.9 g/100 g). The proportions of these ingredients were obtained using a three component, constrained mixture design where the source of soy was either flour (SF) or protein isolate (SPI). Consumer acceptability was measured in terms of nine response variables by 41 consumers using a 9-point hedonic scale. Parameter estimates were determined by performing regression analysis with no intercept option. l-pseudo-components were introduced to get equivalent second degree models further used to generate contour plots. The regions of maximum consumer acceptability [hedonic rating ⩾5.0 since the control (commercial chocolate milk) ratings were 6.0–7.0] were identified and marked on these contour plots for each sensory response. Superimposition of contour plots corresponding to each response variable resulted in optimum regions having consumer acceptability ratings ⩾5.0. Optimum formulations were all the combinations of X1: 34.1 g/100 g–45.5 g/100 g, X2: 31.2 g/100 g–42.9 g/100 g, and X3: 22.4 g/100 g–24.1 g/100 g for SF-based; and X1: 35.8 g/100 g–47.6 g/100 g, X2: 31.2 g/100 g–43.5 g/100 g, and X3: 18.3 g/100 g–23.6 g/100 g for SPI-based beverage formulations.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: LWT - Food Science and Technology - Volume 41, Issue 8, November 2008, Pages 1485–1492
نویسندگان
, , ,