کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5046412 1475984 2017 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Confined to a tokenistic status: Social scientists in leadership roles in a national health research funding agency
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
محدود به یک وضعیت تقسیم بندی: دانشمندان علوم اجتماعی در نقش رهبری در یک سازمان تامین مالی تحقیقات ملی
کلمات کلیدی
میان رشته ای، سیاست بهداشتی، آژانس تأمین مالی بهداشت، علوم اجتماعی، عرفان معرفتی، جدا کردن، موسسات تحقیقاتی بهداشت کانادا، کانادا،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی سیاست های بهداشت و سلامت عمومی
چکیده انگلیسی


- There is a gap between the interdisciplinarity ideal and its implementation at CIHR.
- Inclusion of social scientists in CIHR's upper echelons is mostly tokenistic.
- Biomedical scientists predominate in all decision-making roles.
- Non-academics are represented in greater numbers in decision-making roles than previously.
- Interdisciplinarity policies may not be erasing boundaries, but reproducing them.

The idea of interdisciplinarity has been taken up by academic and governmental organisations around the world and enacted through science policies, funding programs and higher education institutions. In Canada, interdisciplinarity led to a major transformation in health research funding. In 2000, the federal government closed the Medical Research Council (MRC) and created the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). From the outset, CIHR's vision and goals were innovative, as it sought to include the social sciences within its purview alongside more traditional health research sectors. The extent to which it has been successful in this endeavour, however, remains unknown. The aim of our study was to examine how CIHR's intentions to foster inclusiveness and cooperation across disciplines were implemented in the agency's own organisational structure. We focused on social scientists' representation on committees and among decision-makers between 2000 and 2015, one of the key mandates of CIHR being to include the social sciences within its remit and support research in this area. We examined the composition of the Governing Council, the Institute Scientific Directors, the Chairs of the College of Reviewers, and two International Review Panels invited by CIHR. We targeted these committees and decision-makers since they hold the power to influence the field of Canadian health research through the decisions they make. Our findings show that, while CIHR was created with the mandate to support the entire spectrum of health-related research-including the social sciences-this call for inclusiveness has not yet been materialized in the agency's organisational structure. Social scientists, as well as researchers from neighbouring disciplines such as social epidemiology, health promotion and the humanities, are still confined to low levels of representation within CIHR's highest echelons. This imbalance limits social scientists' input into health research in Canada and undermines CIHR's interdisciplinary ambition.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Social Science & Medicine - Volume 185, July 2017, Pages 137-146
نویسندگان
, ,